Human unity with its Environment

1.Influence sorts NatureAs well as another life being, man continually gets interaction with its environment. Man regards its environment, conversely, it also being regarded by its environment. As is man, which is fenotipenya formed by interaction among Genotipe and its environment. Genotipe not also constant, but perpetually experiences changing since mark sense mutation to mark sense mutation on gene in its chromosome, well spontanous mutation and also mutation because environment influence.

With happening gene mutation, therefore man, although just comprise of one type, which is gay msapiens, but variety (diversity) genotipenya really outgrows. This happening on human forbear where with marks sense genotipenya's variety therefore opportunity openended outgrows to its happening nature selection.

That selection happening passes through nature factor, and of course also via cultural social force. Happening fact Just individual suitably or gets to conform by its environment can amends. Thing that is that espouse man evolution of its forbear, Australopithecus africanus, as modern man, sapiens's gay.

2.Picture domiciles Man in environmentsPlace domiciles man be intermediated by environment it can be seen of two facets:
First: of behavioural structure facet and ability.
Can be sorted as follows:
· Inorganic level (off object): just have weight and style, move don't alone willingness settle.
· Plant levels: have had life to get growing, but is still dependent on tries a fall her outboard.
· Animal level: there is life and growth, there is spirit and the will that bases regularity (insting,instinct).
· Human level: having equipment as being of life that gets the will and discreet kindness, one that thus principally gets to have done terminological willingness thyself. 
This thread get as follows been figured:
Man
Animal level
Organic level
Inorganic level
Source: Fredy Buntaran, OFM, Sister Earths...,
In this view man lies on superordinate than object position or another being.
Both of: Of position facet in entirely ecosystem get as follows been figured: 
Ecosystem
Environmentally
biotik
Environmentally
abiotik
Man
Source; Fredy Buntaran, OFM, Sister Earths

In image upon visible that man is at another elements, are not above and nor under another one. In view all element forms an ecosystem circle that gets bearing each other. Man and elements anothering to give contribution to all ecosystem of its place each. Position as this is that more reflect relationship among elements in an interdependence relationship each other.

Developing Concept in point about environment
Of many explanation hit manner theory about environment, added by picture hits relationship and man position in universe, need formulated a grasp and getting better attitude and accounts for to environment. Grasp that progressively correct is understanding one push on attitude and behaviour that progressively secures keberlangsungan all life process that exists in this universe, including amongst those, man.

1. Environmental manner theories Was described about drd manners main theory environmental: antroposentrisme, biosentrisme and ekosentrisme. Drd it is same strove for liabilities and man accountability to nature. Antroposentrisme, there are many is accused as source of its happening exploits environment. But this theory regular charges man readiness to pet its environment. biosentrisme's theory, centralizing attention on the whole life which have point on itself, attention is not just be attributed to man but also to other living being besides man. ekosentrisme's theory offer grasp that progressively is equal to about environment. Expanded moral care, so ranges ecological community the lot, well the living one and also not. Ekosentrisme that progressively been expanded deep deep ecology and ecosophy, really excite man grasp about behalf all ecological community. Deep ecology charges a new manner that don't get to center to man, but gets center on the whole life in terms effort settle environment problem. One that as moral the world center is not just again man, but all species, including non-human species. Deep ecology is not just a only philosophical grasp about environment, but one konkrit's movement and practical environment saving. This is view which better we develop consistently.

2. Deep ecology and its development
ekosentrisme's concept gets to be expanded and is deepened theory thru deep ecology, as it were popularized by Arne Naess, one that call basic of its philosophy about environment as ecosophy, namely wisdom manages to live in harmony with nature. Human thus wittingly full, asked for to build a kindness and the will wisdom, a life style that progressively in harmony with nature.
There is 8 deep ecology's principles that can see as view that averagely been followed by deep ecology's supporting.

1. Welfare and is fine from manusiawi's life and also life is not manusiawi at earths, having intrinsik's point. This point not pending of useful don't it the world be not manusiawi for the purpose man.
2. Wealth and life form varieties, menyumbangkan to materialize it this point and constitutes alone points.
3. Man don't deserve to reduce wealth and this variety, but to meet the need vital.
4. Are fine from life and man culture can be geared by reduced its substansia's ala population. Be fine life is not manusiawi requires to be reduced its that population.
5. Human interference with world non-human now outsize, and situation deteriorates with quick.
6. In consequence common policy shall changed. That policy concern basic structures at economic area, technology and ideology. Evoked situation as it were result it will variably exhaustively with present structures.
7. Changing ideological is particularly price life quality (its mean, man can stay behind deep situation which valuably inheren), and doesn't get to hold on life default that excelsior. Will arise visceral consciousness will difference among big(=amount) and great(=quality).
8. They who agree items in advance honor bound straightforward and indirect to labour arrange changing one need.

Man just can utilize this nature after utility on her while paying attention regular being petted of it environment continuity. Harmony that really and balance that healthy among man requirement and preservation environmentally charges also nature rout by human tech wisdom. Because of two following extreme attitudes have to be refused: First, see and treats nature in as much as good for man and gain control it in as much as enabled by technology ability one eye; and the second one is, ism ’ nature mysticism ’ in as much as that ism looks on that this the world has to be accepted pitches upon and may not at what apakan by man. Both of view it is first, memutlakkan interferes man to nature, and the second one refuses absolutely man interference to nature.

3. Human correct position deep.Deep ecology's view estimable because place man as part of nature. View ekosentrisme can also insofar correct that view not undone man of nature. Nature really have intrisik's point, that don't cling to its benefit for man. But then, we need also realistic see that teknokratis's approaching have taken in benefit that not necessarily even not necessarily been removed again. One that has to be refused is teknokratis's approaching that wreck nature and not pets it. On the contrary, if we accept ekosentrisme, we may not fall deep extreme other, which is ” ekofasisme ”, whereabouts man as individual is sacrified to nature as overall as [vii]  Just man that our naming ’ persona ” that have special dignity, that don't be had by another life being. Biospherical egalitarianisme cannot be right if slated as equation of dignity all being lives.

Admitting that whole being has deep point itself, including in such event human, may not take in degree cut back consequence and man dignity as the one only of being at earths it who have kindness and free will mind. But then special dignity imposition to human person, few unreduced nature dignity even, but just increased. With idiosyncrasy that its proprietary, man becomes being the one only live that has a moral responsibility, to itself and also its environment. Therefore, via man, nature is in control of try fortune.